Chun Hsin Tseng vs Deni Zmak Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L L W W L L
Form
W W W L W L L W W LHead-To-Head: Tseng 1 - 0 Zmak
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tseng winning 2 and Zmak winning 0. The last match between Tseng and Zmak was at the Plava Laguna Croatia Open - Umag, 20-07-2024, Q1 round, Clay with Chun Hsin Tseng getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chun Hsin Tseng | 1 |
| Deni Zmak | 0 |
Plava Laguna Croatia Open - Umag(20-07-2024)
6
2
6
4
| Tseng | Stats | Zmak |
|---|---|---|
| 46% (12-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (2-1) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 98 | Ranking | N/A |
| 83 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 23 | Age | 35 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (251-181) | Career Total W/L | 54% (53-45) |
| $358,975 | Career Prize Money | $500 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Uchijima VS Montgomery PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Goffin VS Muller PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Deni Zmak
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:20:9 | Average Match Time | 1:20:9 |
| 55% (28/51) | 1st Serve % | 48% (25/52) |
| 93% (26/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (19/25) |
| 61% (14/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (12/27) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/3) |
| 40% (21/52) | Return Points Win % | 22% (11/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chun Hsin Tseng Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Cristian Garin
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
56%
(
62 of
111)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
89)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
39%
(
19 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
89)
100
Total Points Won
100
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Billy Harris
52%
(
47 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
73%
(
32 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Christopher O'Connell
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
25 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Gregoire Barrere
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
25 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Mattia Bellucci
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
79%
(
22 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
11 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Deni Zmak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Marko Maksimovic
Player
Deni Zmak
91%
(
10 of
11)
1st Serve %
53%
(
8 of
15)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
40%
(
4 of
10)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
12
Total Points Won
14
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Deni Zmak
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sebastian Dominko
Player
Deni Zmak
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
57
|
2-6 6-3 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alen Rogic Hadzalic
Player
Deni Zmak
68%
(
69 of
102)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
36 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Deni Zmak
Player
Matej Galik
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Deni Zmak
Player
Pasquale De Giorgio
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (251/181) | Win/Loss | 54% (53/45) |
| 56% (570/450) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (119/100) |
| 52% (5013/4555) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (1064/915) |
| 58% (103/75) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) |
| 61% (127/81) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (51/42) |
| 49% (21/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 1097 | Aces Total | 111 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 1034 | Total Double Faults | 63 |
| 1:43:9 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 405.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 378.15 |
| 59% (17500/29568) | 1st Serve % | 58% (1110/1904) |
| 68% (11842/17500) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (797/1110) |
| 51% (6179/12068) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (392/794) |
| 42% (1325/3139) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (90/187) |
| 41% (12222/29812) | Return Points Win % | 41% (811/1959) |
| 38% (6/10) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (7/10) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (7/5) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 32% (11/23) | Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (151/105) | Challenger W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 71% (69/28) | Futures W/L | 56% (50/39) |
| 59% (245/412) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (53/98) |
| 8% (1/13) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (60/127) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 31% (5/16) |
| 55% (81/147) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (10/23) |
| 84% (247/208) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (55/47) |
| 16% (247/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (55/8) |
| 23% (185/43) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (43/6) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
